Shift in Policy Orientation, Reshaping the New Paradigm for Outcome Evaluation

Against the macro background of the country's continuous deepening of technological system reform, the field of achievement appraisal is undergoing a profound policy orientation transformation, which has brought a new development pattern to the entire industry.
In recent years, the government has gradually withdrawn from its role as the direct organizer of achievement appraisal and shifted its focus to macro management and supervision. In 2016, the State Council issued a document to abolish the "Management Measures for Scientific and Technological Achievement Appraisal", marking the comprehensive transition of achievement appraisal work to market-oriented operation. This measure aims to break the limitations of the government led model, fully stimulate market vitality, and enable professional third-party institutions to play a leading role in outcome appraisal. Taking a certain province as an example, since the policy adjustment, the province has actively cultivated third-party achievement appraisal institutions. As of the end of 2024, more than 50 third-party institutions with professional qualifications have been certified. These institutions, with their professional advantages in different fields and flexible market operation mechanisms, provide more diversified and accurate appraisal services for various scientific research achievements.
At the same time, the policy level increasingly emphasizes the standardization and construction of achievement appraisal. In 2021, the Guiding Opinions of the General Office of the State Council on Improving the Evaluation Mechanism for Scientific and Technological Achievements clearly proposed the "Five Element Value" evaluation system for scientific, technological, economic, social, and cultural achievements. The construction of this system provides a comprehensive and systematic evaluation framework for outcome appraisal. Various regions have formulated local achievement appraisal rules based on this guidance. If a certain city introduces a policy that requires comprehensive consideration of the five dimensions of "five element value" when evaluating scientific and technological achievements, and specifies specific evaluation indicators and weights for each dimension. This makes the appraisal of achievements no longer limited to a simple technical evaluation, but more focused on the comprehensive value of achievements in practical applications.
In terms of incentive policies, the government encourages enterprises and research institutions to actively participate in achievement appraisal through various means. Some regions have established special incentive funds to provide financial support for projects that have passed high-quality achievement appraisal. For example, a certain economic development zone rewards project teams with up to 1 million yuan for scientific and technological achievements that have obtained international leading level certification. In addition, enterprises and projects that have passed the results appraisal can also enjoy various policy preferences in terms of tax incentives and project declaration. A high-tech enterprise, relying on its innovative achievements that have been appraised, successfully obtained the priority project approval qualification when applying for the national key research and development plan project, which greatly enhances the enthusiasm of the enterprise to carry out scientific research innovation and achievement appraisal.
With the continuous transformation of policy orientation, achievement appraisal is gradually forming a new pattern of government regulation, market dominance, and multi-party participation, which effectively promotes the high-quality development and effective transformation of scientific and technological achievements.




Please first Loginlater ~